LIFE INC. How the World Became a Corporation and How To Take It Back Douglas Rushkoff New York: Random House, 2009 |
Rating: 5.0 High |
|||
ISBN-13 978-1-4000-6689-6 | ||||
ISBN-10 1-4000-6689-1 | 274pp. | HC | $26.00 |
Douglas Rushkoff, in the course of turning history on its head, paints a grim picture. His version of the Middle Ages posits that the period began with widespread prosperity among local communities with discrete currency systems. (There were global currencies too. They supported long-distance transactions that required larger capital outlays, like the voyages that brought pepper from the Spice Islands of Indonesia.) Here's how he describes it:
"The coexistence of these two kinds of currencies with very different purposes and biases led to an economic expansion unlike any we have seen since. Sometimes called the 'first Renaissance,' the late Middle Ages offered an enviable quality of life for ordinary people. The working class enjoyed four meals a day, usually of three or four courses. They worked six hours a day, and just four or five days a week—unless they were celebrating one of about one hundred fifty annual holidays. Medievalists from Francois Icher to D. Damaschke almost unanimously agree that between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries, the quality of life of Europeans was better than at any other period of history, including today." – Page 166 |
Then, around 1400 A.D., the various monarchs began issuing corporate charters which outlawed local currencies and rather quickly centralized wealth in the hands of one or a few favored corporate entities.1
"Be careful," said God. "One touch of that can turn you all into hermit crabs — I mean, corporations."
The idea of the corporation, a business endowed with quasi-human attributes and thereby entitled to certain privileges, has a long history. Corporations like the British East India Company figured in that country's globe-girdling empire, including its American colonies. America's founding fathers took care to limit the powers granted to corporations. But the executives of those corporations have never missed an opportunity to expand those powers. They won a battle in 1886,2 and another last year with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.3
"History books gloss over or omit entirely the process through which monarchs outlawed certain currencies while promoting others. Contemporary economists, meanwhile, seem oblivious of the concept that other kinds of money with very different biases ever existed. The system they call 'the economy' is not a set of natural laws, but a series of observations and strategies based on a very particular game with a carefully developed set of rules. It has simply been in place so long that our business and finance professionals have forgotten there were ever any alternatives. Over the course of my research, I interviewed fiscal strategists at Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, and Smith Barney about the biases of the money we use, and not one of them understood what I was talking about. 'I'm not an economics historian,' one chief economist explained. 'There's other kinds of money?' the head of one currency desk asked." Yes, there are. Or at least there were. The kind of money we use—centralized currency—is just one of them. Moneys are not neutral media any more than guns, televisions, or pillows are neutral technologies. They each favor certain kinds of behaviors and discourage others." – Page 162 |
The main idea is that each of these local currencies served its community as a medium of exchange for day-by-day commerce, whereas the centralized medium of exchange mandated by monarchy fostered hoarding or concentration of wealth. But Rushkoff's main concern is with the present. His extensive research has disclosed that the concentration of wealth is perpetuated by today's financial elite, who have become adept at manipulating the centrifugal forces of the current system.
It is not only by lobbying or other political influence that they do this. Big-business rules reward short-term profit even when that results in financial disaster later on. Increasingly, this profit comes not from innovation, better customer service, or superior productivity, but from financial manipulations including including the minimization of payrolls. Nor do the interests of the community figure into these rules, either on a short-term or long-term basis. If gentrification of a neighborhood turns it into a gated enclave of high-class dormitories for executives who commute to the city, displacing the vibrant community that formerly thrived there, that seldom troubles the elites who benefit from the neighborhood's transformation.
But influencing the legislative process is an important arrow in the elites' quiver. This Rushkoff documents with great thoroughness in this book. The legal fiction of corporate personhood is a key factor. Rushkoff reveals how assiduously American corporations have pursued this privilege (see sidebar.) Funding educational reformers is another arrow.4 The art of public relations, as developed by Bernays and his ilk, is yet another (see pp. 16-20.)
The situation today is dire, and Rushkoff is one of the leading lights in a movement to improve the lot of real persons. He has written fourteen books including this one, teaches media studies at the New School, hosts The Media Squat on radio station WFMU, and serves on the board of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics as well as boards of other organizations. He has produced award-winning documentaries for Frontline and maintains a Web site. The book provides an extensive set of endnotes, referenced both by number and by text fragment. Its index is one of the best I have seen. You can find it at your local library. You should do so soonest. It is a must read and a keeper.
UPDATE 4 November 2011: Life, Inc. is out in a revised edition: a paperback from Random House Trade Paperbacks (January, 2011).
See the list at right.